Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the amp domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_has_paired_endpoint was called incorrectly. Function cannot be called before services are registered. The service ID "paired_routing" is not recognized and cannot be retrieved. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.1.1.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is not currently doing any hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. The function was called too early (before the plugins_loaded action) to determine the plugin source. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_has_paired_endpoint was called incorrectly. Function cannot be called before services are registered. The service ID "paired_routing" is not recognized and cannot be retrieved. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.1.1.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is not currently doing any hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. The function was called too early (before the plugins_loaded action) to determine the plugin source. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `plugins_loaded` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `google-analytics-for-wordpress` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `plugins_loaded` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `google-analytics-for-wordpress` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function amp_is_available was called incorrectly. `amp_is_available()` (or `amp_is_request()`, formerly `is_amp_endpoint()`) was called too early and so it will not work properly. WordPress is currently doing the `init` hook. Calling this function before the `wp` action means it will not have access to `WP_Query` and the queried object to determine if it is an AMP response, thus neither the `amp_skip_post()` filter nor the AMP enabled toggle will be considered. It appears the plugin with slug `google-analytics-for-wordpress` is responsible; please contact the author. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 2.0.0.) in /home/u814201603/domains/kriptobulten.online/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Bitcoin ETF başvurusu geri çekildi - Kripto Bülten
Site icon Kripto Bülten

Bitcoin ETF başvurusu geri çekildi

Ali Kaya
bitcoin- etf- kripto- bülten

SEC tarafından yayınlanan belgeye göre CBOE, kripto para piyasasının merakla beklediği Bitcoin ETF başvurusunu geri çekti.

Başvuru ilk olarak geçtiğimiz yılın Haziran ayında yapılmıştı ve başvuruya ilişkin karar bugüne kadar SEC tarafından daha fazla inceleme yapılması gerektiği gerekçesiyle birkaç defa ertelendi. Son olarak nihai kararının Şubat ayının sonuna kadar verilmesi bekleniyordu.Yaşanan son gelişmeye göre CBOE, VanEck SolidX Bitcoin ETF’si başvurusunu geri çekti.

Bugün yayınlanan bildiride ABD Menkul Kıymetler ve Borsalar Komisyonu (SEC) sekreter yardımcısı Eduardo Aleman, CBOE’nin onaylandığı takdirde VanEck SolidX Bitcoin Trust hisselerinin listelenmesine izin verecek kural değişikliği başvurusunu geri çektiğini yazdı. Borsa, 22 Ocak’ta başvuruyu geri çekme talebinde bulundu.

SEC tarafından yayınlanan belgede başvurunun neden geri çekildiğiyle alakalı olarak herhangi bir sebep gösterilmedi. Bununla birlikte bazı menkul kıymet hukukçuları, ABD hükümetin hala kapalı oluşunun SEC’deki hiçbir çalışanın önerilen kural değişikliğini gözden geçirememesi nedeniyle zaten redde neden olacağını belirtti.

VanEck’in CEO’su Jan van Eck ise başvurunun geri çekildiğini onayladı ve SEC ile devam eden görüşmeleri takiben daha sonraki bir tarihte yeniden yapılacağını bildirdi.

Exit mobile version